Law & Practice
UNITED STATES: Allegations of “Trademark Bullying” Insufficient to Plead Unclean Hands at TTAB
Published: October 16, 2024
Aidan McNamara Foley & Lardner LLP Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
Lindsey Birch Foley & Lardner LLP Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA INTA Bulletins—North America Subcommittee
Verifier
Bryce Maynard Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney P.C. Alexandria, Virginia, USA INTA Bulletins—North America Subcommittee
In a rare precedential decision, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (the Board) granted a motion to strike the affirmative defense of “unclean hands” based on an allegation of “trademark bullying.” See DoorDash, Inc. v. Greenerside Holdings, LLC, 2024 USPQ2d 935 (TTAB 2024) (precedential).
Greenerside Holdings, LLC (the applicant) filed the below DOOR DABZ & Design mark in connection with the delivery of medical cannabis (with the federally appropriate THC concentration) using car service. In opposing the application, Doordash, Inc. (the opposer) alleged a likelihood of confusion with eight registered DOORDASH marks principally covering delivery services.
The applicant asserted the sole affirmative defense of unclean hands. In support of the defense, the applicant alleged that the opposer engaged in “trademark bullying” as evidenced by the opposer’s position as:
- One of the top Board proceeding filers;
- Prior oppositions asserting “dubious, weak or exaggerated” grounds;
- Use of aggressive litigation tactics to the disadvantage of the applicant’s status as a small business; and
- The “misuse of a trademark.”
In its motion to strike, the opposer argued that the applicant’s defense was conclusory and unsupported by facts as required by Rule 8(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Board noted that in the context of trademark infringement litigation, courts have awarded sanctions as a result of “over-aggressive trademark enforcement” with no reasonable basis for recovery. J. Thomas McCarthy, 2 McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition, § 11:93 (5th ed. Westlaw 2023).
However, the Board previously ruled in Time Warner Entm’t Co. v. Jones, an unclean hands defense is not established by a registrant “seek[ing] to protect its rights in its registered marks, and preclud[ing] the registration of what it believes to be a confusingly similar mark.” Opp. No. 91112409, 2002 TTAB LEXIS 462, at *2 n.4 (TTAB 2002).
Therefore, the Board rejected the applicant’s argument, stating that “every trademark owner has [the] right to protect its trademark” under the Lanham Act, and that the opposer was “merely exercising its right to protect its marks.” Here, the Board found nothing to suggest the opposer did anything other than protect its rights in its registered marks.
The Board’s decision affirms that “bullying” alone is not enough to establish an unclean hands defense. Perhaps a plea with more specific allegations would have survived. However, practitioners will have to wait for another case as the Board barred the applicant from repleading the defense given that its allegations did not support the affirmative defense. The proceedings will now resume for the Board to consider the opposer’s likelihood of confusion allegations.
Although every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of this article, readers are urged to check independently on matters of specific concern or interest. Law & Practice updates are published without comment from INTA except where it has taken an official position.
© 2024 International Trademark Association
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
To find out more please see our Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.
These cookies are used to identify a user’s browser as the visitor goes from page to page on the Site. These are session cookies, which means that the cookie is deleted when you leave the Site. It is an integral piece of the Site software and used to let the server know which users are on the Site at any given time and make certain parts of the Site easier to use.
|
|
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
These cookies are used to collect information about how visitors use our Site. The cookies collect information in anonymous form, including the numbers of visitors to the Site, where visitors have come to the Site from, the pages they visited and how they have interacted with tools on the Site like search and embedded media players. We use the information to compile statistical reports of our users’ browsing patterns so that we can improve the Site.
|
|
Please enable Functionality Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!
These cookies are used to deliver advertising relevant to the interests of visitors to our Site. They are persistent, which means they will remain on your device after you leave the Site.
- Facebook (Ad Pixel)
- Google (Ad Pixel)
- LinkedIn (Ad Pixel)
- Quattro Anonymous
Please enable Functionality Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!